Indonesia sentences Gojek founder to 10 years for graft over procurement of school laptops

Indonesia sentences Gojek founder to 10 years for graft over procurement of school laptops
June 30, 2026

LATEST NEWS

Indonesia sentences Gojek founder to 10 years for graft over procurement of school laptops

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.Read more

Indonesia’s anti-graft court on Tuesday sentenced one of the co-founders of ride-hailing and payments giant Gojek to 10 years in prison after finding him guilty in a high-profile corruption case stemming from his time as education minister.

Nadiem Anwar Makarim was convicted of pushing his ministry to buy Google Chromebook laptops for schools during the COVID-19 pandemic as the American tech giant was considering an investment in Gojek’s parent company.

A panel of five judges at Jakarta’s Corruption Court ordered Makarim to repay 809 billion rupiah (about $45.2 million) — a figure prosecutors said represented the value to him of Google’s investment in PT Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa — and imposed a fine of 1 billion rupiah (about $55,870). Prosectors said the purchasing decision also caused $125 million in state losses.

“The defendant, as a minister who should serve as a role model, abused his authority. His actions were deliberate, structured and systematic,” said presiding Judge Purwanto S. Abdullah, “As a high-ranking official, the defendant exacerbated the situation during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the education sector was already in crisis.”

The court didn’t find that Makarim’s push to buy Chromebooks actually influenced Google. Three former Google executives testified during the trial that Google’s investment in GoTo was unrelated to the Indonesian government’s decision.

The 10-year sentence was far below the 18 years sought by prosecutors. Prosecutors told the three-judge panel that he abused his position to influence policy decisions and corporate dealings.

The judges said they reduced the penalty because Makarim, 41, is still in his productive age and the sentence imposed should not deny the defendant the opportunity for rehabilitation and a return to contributing to society. They also ordered the time he has served since he was arrested in September to be deducted from the sentence.

Makarim was detained with two former education ministry officials and a former tech consultant who were sentenced up to four-and-half years in the case, while another staff member is wanted by authorities but remains at large.

The trial, which started in January, has drawn significant public attention, often attended by hundreds of motorcycle taxi drivers showing support for the man who helped create their industry.

The judges said Makarim’s decision to use ChromeOS and Chrome Education Upgrades — products licensed exclusively by Google — was driven by a conflict of interest, disregarding advice from the ministry’s legal bureau and policies that required to prioritizing domestic products.

“The defendant maintained the Chromebook policy by systematically removing officials who opposed it during his tenure as education and culture minister,” Abdullah said.

In a dissenting opinion, a member of the panel, Andi Saputra, argued that there was not enough evidence and Marakim should be acquitted.

Makarim has denied wrongdoing. Following the verdict he criticized what he called an excessive punishment and said he would appeal.

Share this post:

POLL

Who Will Vote For?

Other

Republican

Democrat

RECENT NEWS

Nukila Evanty: Women Environmental and Human Rights Defenders Facing Multiple Forms of Discrimination - OBSERVER

Nukila Evanty: Women Environmental and Human Rights Defenders Facing Multiple Forms of Discrimination – OBSERVER

Boy Arnez Banjir Tawaran dari Klub Luar Negeri usai Juara AVC Cup 2026

Boy Arnez Banjir Tawaran dari Klub Luar Negeri usai Juara AVC Cup 2026

Polisi Segera Tetapkan Tersangka Kasus Pembubaran Ibadah di Gereja Bantul

Polisi Segera Tetapkan Tersangka Kasus Pembubaran Ibadah di Gereja Bantul

Dynamic Country URL Go to Country Info Page