South Korea’s Yoon gets five-year jail term after being found guilty of abuse of power over martial law bid

South Korea’s Yoon gets five-year jail term after being found guilty of abuse of power over martial law bid
January 17, 2026

LATEST NEWS

South Korea’s Yoon gets five-year jail term after being found guilty of abuse of power over martial law bid

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.Read more

A court in South Korea sentenced disgraced former president Yoon Suk Yeol to five years in prison on Friday after finding him guilty on charges related to his unsuccessful imposition of martial law.

The Seoul Central District Court found Yoon guilty of obstructing authorities from executing an arrest warrant related to his martial law declaration in December 2024. The court also found him guilty of charges that include fabricating official documents and failing to comply with the legal process required for martial law.

“The defendant abused his enormous influence as president to prevent the execution of legitimate warrants through officials from the Security Service, which effectively privatised officials … loyal to the Republic of Korea for personal safety and personal gain,” the lead judge on the three-justice panel said during the televised hearing.

Judge Baek Dae Hyun said “a grave punishment” was necessary because Yoon hadn’t shown remorse and only repeated “hard-to-comprehend excuses”.

“The defendant’s culpability is extremely grave,” he said, according to local media.

Yoon evaded arrest for weeks by remaining inside his residential compound, protected by hundreds of loyal members of the Presidential Security Service.

He was eventually detained in a pre-dawn raid, when security forces pushed their way past bus barricades, cut through barbed wire and used ladders to enter the compound, where he was encircled by his guards. Yoon’s arrest was the first ever of a sitting president in South Korea.

He later claimed he had cooperated to prevent “bloodshed”.

open image in gallery

Supporters of Yoon Suk Yeol hold signs outside Seoul Central District Court on Friday (AP)

The verdict is the first against Yoon in the eight criminal trials over the decree he issued in 2024 and other allegations. The most significant charge against him is that he led a rebellion in connection with his martial law enforcement. This charge carries a potential death penalty.

Yoon, currently held at the Seoul Detention Centre, didn’t respond publicly to the ruling.

One of his lawyers, Yoo Jung Hwa, said the former president would appeal. “We express regret that the decision was made in a politicised manner,” she said.

Previously, when an independent counsel demanded a 10-year prison term for him over those charges, the former president’s defence team accused them of being politically driven and lacking legal grounds to demand such an “excessive” sentence.

Jung Chung Rae, the leader of the ruling Democratic Party, reacted to the verdict, saying “the purge of insurrection has only just begun”.

“From five years’ imprisonment to the death penalty, every speck of insurrection must be punished under the principle of zero tolerance. The eradication of insurrection in the Republic of Korea cannot be accomplished through leniency,” she said in a post on Facebook.

open image in gallery

Yoon evaded arrest for weeks after declaring martial law in December 2024 (AP)

Yoon maintains he didn’t intend to place the country under military rule for an extended period, saying his decree was only meant to inform the people about the danger of the liberal-controlled parliament that obstructed his agenda.

But investigators have viewed his decree as an attempt to bolster and prolong his rule.

Yoon has been impeached, arrested and dismissed as president after his short-lived imposition of martial law triggered huge public protests calling for his removal.

Parliament, joined by some members of Yoon’s conservative party, voted within hours to overturn his surprise martial law decree, which led to his impeachment and subsequent suspension of his powers.

He was removed from office in April last year by the constitutional court, which ruled that he had violated the duties of his office.

Share this post:

POLL

Who Will Vote For?

Other

Republican

Democrat

RECENT NEWS

China’s solar capacity set to overtake coal in ‘historic’ shift

China’s solar capacity set to overtake coal in ‘historic’ shift

Theatre trigger warnings risk ‘mollycoddling’ audiences, says Tony-winning director | Theatre

Theatre trigger warnings risk ‘mollycoddling’ audiences, says Tony-winning director | Theatre

Email appears to confirm photo of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Virginia Giuffre is real | Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

Email appears to confirm photo of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Virginia Giuffre is real | Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

Dynamic Country URL Go to Country Info Page