Supreme Court judgments say state has a duty to preserve life of person on indefinite fast without disrupting right to dissent

Supreme Court judgments say state has a duty to preserve life of person on indefinite fast without disrupting right to dissent
July 16, 2026

LATEST NEWS

Supreme Court judgments say state has a duty to preserve life of person on indefinite fast without disrupting right to dissent

Activist Sonam Wangchuk is on an indefinite hunger strike at New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, seeking resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over irregularities in the NEET examination.
| Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap

Multiple Supreme Court judgments and orders highlight the state’s paternalistic duty of care to preserve the life of a person on a hunger strike without disrupting his right to dissent.

Yet the government has responded to activist Sonam Wanghuk’s ongoing fasting at Jantar Mantar with silence for the past 19 days even as an alarmed Delhi High Court asserted on July 16 that the “life of any citizen is precious”.

Published – July 16, 2026 09:34 pm IST

Share this post:

POLL

Who Will Vote For?

Other

Republican

Democrat

RECENT NEWS

UCC push aimed at keeping society polarised, says Congress

UCC push aimed at keeping society polarised, says Congress

Operations at UAE’s Shah gas field suspended after drone attack, media office says

Monsoon Session of Odisha House witnesses ruckus over textbook errors, mines Act

What is scrub typhus | Explained

What is scrub typhus | Explained

Dynamic Country URL Go to Country Info Page