At the heart of any democracy lies the idea that citizenship is a right, not a privilege handed out or taken away by one man’s whims. But since his return to office, President Donald Trump has been on a relentless mission to upend this foundational principle. His attempt to end birthright citizenship on his first day back in office set the tone for a second term filled with escalating threats—not just toward immigrants, but toward anyone who publicly disagrees with him.

Most recently, Trump has made headlines for threatening to revoke the citizenship of comedian Rosie O’Donnell, a U.S.-born citizen, simply because he doesn’t like her. He made this explosive statement on Truth Social, highlighting a disturbing pattern: Trump believes he can use stripping U.S. citizenship as a tool of punishment. And while it may seem outrageous, it’s far from empty talk. This is all part of a broader strategy involving denaturalization, constitutional defiance, and what can only be called a blatant presidential abuse of power.

What Does the Constitution Say About Birthright Citizenship?

The answer is crystal clear. The 14th Amendment citizenship clause, ratified in 1868, states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”

This means that anyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. But Trump has long argued otherwise, falsely claiming that the Constitution doesn’t guarantee birthright citizenship to children of immigrants. Despite multiple judicial rulings and expert legal opinions, Trump has pushed the idea that he can end this guarantee through executive order.

This raises a pressing question: What does the Constitution say about citizenship? Quite a lot. In addition to the 14th Amendment, other constitutional clauses protect citizens from arbitrary government action. Trump’s disregard for these protections reflects a wider hostility toward legal norms.

What Happens If Birthright Citizenship Is Removed?

If birthright citizenship were somehow overturned, it would fundamentally reshape what it means to be American. Millions of people, born and raised in the U.S., could find themselves stateless or forced to “prove” their citizenship.

Here’s what we risk losing:

• Legal Clarity: A clear constitutional rule would become a political weapon.
• Stability: Children of immigrants would live in fear of losing their rights.
• Precedent: A new system could emerge where citizenship depends on politics, not law.

What happens if birthright citizenship is removed? Chaos. It would upend the lives of American-born individuals and give the federal government unchecked power to redefine citizenship.

Can the U.S. President Revoke Someone’s Citizenship?

In short, no—not legally. The president does not have unilateral authority to revoke someone’s citizenship, especially if they were born in the U.S. Yet Trump’s public musings and his administration’s growing interest in denaturalization efforts show he is exploring ways to get around the law.

Naturalized citizens have more legal vulnerability. Trump’s Justice Department previously launched a task force aimed at stripping U.S. citizenship from naturalized citizens accused of misrepresentation on immigration forms.

But targeting citizenship rights in America based on political opinions or speech? That’s clearly unconstitutional.

Is Trump Trying to Redefine Citizenship?

Absolutely. The goal is to create a tiered citizenship system where loyalty to the president defines who gets full rights. Under this logic, anyone—immigrants, activists, celebrities—who speaks against Trump could be marked for retaliation.

That’s not just dangerous. It’s authoritarian.

He’s not merely testing the boundaries of executive power; he’s rewriting the narrative of what the Constitution says about citizenship. And it’s not just rhetoric—Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order has already sparked multiple lawsuits, including a major 14th Amendment challenge that could reach the Supreme Court.

How Does This Tie Into the First Amendment?

Trump’s threat to Rosie O’Donnell’s citizenship is about more than immigration policy. It’s about silencing critics. And that strikes at the very core of the First Amendment—freedom of speech.

Trump has repeatedly targeted political opponents, from Bruce Springsteen to Democratic lawmakers like Zohran Mamdani, suggesting they could be investigated or deported simply for opposing him. This pattern demonstrates not only contempt for the Constitution but a dangerous escalation of presidential power.

It also highlights the increasing politicization of agencies meant to protect Americans. Under Trump, the Department of Justice appears to be pursuing political cases to support the president’s personal vendettas.

What Makes This a 14th Amendment Challenge?

The legal cases challenging Trump’s executive order will be closely watched because they put the 14th Amendment citizenship clause directly on trial. If the courts were to uphold Trump’s order, it would open the door to redefining who gets to be an American—and who doesn’t.

Here’s what’s at stake:

• Constitutional Integrity: Can the president ignore a foundational amendment?
• Rule of Law: Can citizenship be redefined without an act of Congress?
• Future Precedent: Could future leaders use this same power to punish opponents?

The implications of a successful 14th Amendment challenge would echo for generations.

Where Do We Go From Here?

It’s crucial that Americans remain informed and engaged. Birthright citizenship is not just a legal technicality; it’s a core democratic principle. Trump’s attempts to undercut this right aren’t just theoretical. They are part of a coordinated effort to reshape the very idea of American identity.

Action Steps for Concerned Citizens:

• Stay Informed: Follow ongoing legal battles and executive actions.
• Call Your Representatives: Demand they speak out against unconstitutional overreach.
• Support Advocacy Groups: Organizations fighting to protect citizenship rights in America need your help.
• Vote: Civic participation is the strongest antidote to authoritarianism.

In a time when democratic norms are under siege, the idea that one man can determine who counts as American should send a chill down everyone’s spine. Birthright citizenship is not up for debate—it’s enshrined in the Constitution. But under Trump, even the Constitution is being treated as optional.

Dreaming of a country that respects the rights of all its people means defending the Constitution when it matters most. That time is now.

Read More: Amanda Anisimova Reaches First Wimbledon Final