Bernd Debusmann Jrat the White House
Getty Images
Defence secretary Pete Hegseth says that he watched the first of two strikes on the alleged drug vessel on 2 September.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has said he “did not personally see survivors” before a deadly follow-up strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean.
An initial strike reportedly left two survivors clinging to the burning vessel, before a second strike was allegedly ordered that left them dead.
The 2 September strike has prompted concerns that US forces may have violated laws governing armed conflict.
During a cabinet meeting at the White House, Hegseth attributed the strike to the “fog of war” in a chaotic situation. The White House has said that a top US Navy admiral, Frank Bradley, authorised the second strike.
The Washington Post first reported details about the second strike, which has led to concern from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers.
In response to a reporter’s question during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Hegseth said that he watched the first strike “live” but quickly moved on to another meeting.
“I did not personally see survivors,” Hegseth said of the first strike. “That thing was on fire and it exploded… you can’t see anything. This is called the fog of war.”
He added that he learned of Admiral Bradley’s “correct decision” to sink the boat “a couple of hours later”.
“We have his back,” Hegseth said of Bradley.
President Donald Trump, for his part, also defended Adm Bradley, although he distanced himself from his decision to strike the vessel a second time, saying that “we didn’t know about” the follow-on strike.
“And I can say this: I want those boats taken out,” Trump added.
More than 80 people have been killed in a wave of similar strikes across the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific since early September.
The Trump administration has repeatedly defended the strikes as a necessary self-defence measure to save American lives from illicit drugs.
Watch: “I did not personally see survivors”, Hegseth says of second deadly boat strike
On Tuesday, Trump claimed that the strikes had led to a massive reduction in drug trafficking through maritime routes, although he did not provide evidence.
US lawmakers from both sides of the political spectrum have expressed unease about the 2 September incident, with the Senate Armed Services committee vowing over the weekend to conduct “vigorous oversight” to determine what occurred.
Adm Bradley – who was commander of the US military’s Joint Special Operations Command at the time of the strike – is expected to appear on Capitol Hill this week.
He is now overall commander of US Special Operations Command, having been promoted a month after the 2 September incident.
The Geneva Conventions forbid the intentional targeting of wounded combatants, saying that those participants should be apprehended and given medical aid.
Several experts who spoke to the BBC expressed doubts that the reported follow-up strike could be considered legal under international law.
Trump’s critics have attacked the White House for its piecemeal revelation of information of the incident. Hegseth first dismissed the Washington Post report as “fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory” – before the White House later confirmed that a second strike had, in fact, taken place, and Hegseth made his “fog of war” remark.
Since the 2 September strikes, the US has significantly expanded its military presence in the region, with Trump again on Tuesday vowing to “start doing those strikes on land”.
