Senator Jonathan Joseph

The political landscape in Antigua and Barbuda is no stranger to sharp disagreements, fiery debates, and party rivalries—but when a senior party member is publicly ridiculed, chastised, and dragged back in line by his own political family, questions must be asked about the true state of democracy and internal party freedom.

That was the case with United Progressive Party (UPP) Senator Jonathan Joseph, who found himself at the center of an unseemly public takedown—first in the Senate chamber, and later on Observer

Radio, where his own party appeared to throw him to the wolves.

Joseph, a seasoned professional with over 25 years in the hotel and tourism sector, had taken what many would consider a rational, experience-informed position: he supported the Antigua Labour Party’s decision to invest in the Jolly Beach property and turn it over to the Social Security Scheme as a potential income-generating asset.

As someone who worked his way up the hotel industry to a managerial position, Joseph spoke not from guesswork, but from grounded expertise in a sector that is the beating heart of the Antiguan economy.

Yet for having the courage to express a view not rubber-stamped by the party’s inner sanctum, Senator Joseph was treated like a traitor, not a valued senior member.

In the Senate, fellow UPP Senator Pearl Quinn-Williams launched a blistering and humiliating attack on Joseph, outright rejecting his stance and even implying he was misinformed or misguided, suggesting that he missed the class.

Her behavior was not only dismissive, it bordered on theatrical disdain—despite her limited background in hospitality, having worked only as line staff at Half Moon Bay and later as a bank teller.

Nevertheless, she tore into Joseph’s remarks with little more than emotion and party loyalty.

It was the political equivalent of a public flogging, putting asside her fidgited debate.

Then came Observer Radio, where any chance for reflection or clarification was stripped away by a pair of hosts who treated Joseph with open contempt. Rude, loud, combative, and condescending, the hosts effectively cornered the Senator,

pushing him into what many now see as a forced retraction. Joseph, once confident in his stance, suddenly began to walk back his remarks, contradicting his earlier position in what can only be described as an act of political submission.

To use a local colloquialism, Senator Joseph “lopped his tail like a little puppy dog,” as if sent by the “leadership within the leadership” to correct the record—not based on new facts, but on internal party pressure.

The message was clear: in today’s UPP, there’s no room for independent thought.

You either echo the official line from party figures like Chairperson Gisele Isaac and Chaku Symister or risk being branded a dissenter and thrown out the party, like the Joanne Messiah, the Anthony Smith Jr. and the Lamin Newton.

The party’s growing intolerance of

divergent views was recently on full display when Isaac publicly rebuked former UPP leader Harold Lovell for referring to a former youth leader as a “brother”—declaring that he was no longer a brother due to his resignation from the party.

This is the kind of ideological rigidity that signals a deeper rot within the party: loyalty is not earned but demanded, and independence is punished.

So what now for Senator Joseph? How does he return to his constituents—many of whom live in tourism-heavy constituencies and may have supported his original position on the Jolly Beach investment?

How does a man, stripped of dignity by his own colleagues and media aligned with his own party, face a community that expected leadership, not capitulation?

Senator Joseph may have been trying to

put country above party, using his industry knowledge to assess a proposal on its merits. But in today’s UPP, it seems such intellectual honesty is not only unwelcome—it is grounds for public discipline.

The party must decide whether it wants loyal parrots or thoughtful leaders. Because the treatment of Jonathan Joseph is not just a personal embarrassment—it is a political disgrace, and a chilling message to any member who dares to think for themselves.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]