Ex-SC judge Justice Kaul flags ‘punishment’ of prolonged custody before conviction NEW DELHI: Former Supreme Court judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul has said that the period before conviction or acquittal has become a “punishment” in India, commenting on the denial of bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. He said that prolonged legal proceedings can themselves become a form of punishment and that bail should generally be the norm.In an interview with news agency ANI, Kaul said he had generally taken a liberal view on bail, but acknowledged that certain laws explicitly restrict the granting of bail in specific cases.“I have taken a generally very liberal view on bail. I feel the bail cannot be the punishment. The conviction is the punishment. In our system, unfortunately, the pre-conviction or acquittal period itself becomes a punishment. The process becomes a punishment,” former Supreme Court judge said.Kaul said several judges had raised concerns about the issue. He also referred to a judgment written by Justice Sundaresh, with whom he had dealt with the question of bail and the principles governing custody.“And many judges have been writing and talking about it. In fact, I, sitting with Justice Sundaresh, had dealt elaborately with the bail itself, trying to say, why are you people under custody? Justice Sundaresh wrote the judgment. He’s, to my mind, a liberal judge on this. And we tried to lay down norms, etc., which were already in existence, but trying to, you know, until this case. So in most cases, our view is, that bail should be the norm. But there are certain acts which prohibit bail,” said Kaul.Kaul has co-authored an upcoming memoir, Without Fear or Favour, with Jay Vinayak Ojha. The book is scheduled for release on October 31.Khalid and Imam are accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with an alleged larger conspiracy behind the February 2020 northeast Delhi riots. According to the prosecution, the violence left 53 people dead and more than 700 injured.The riots broke out amid protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, and the proposed National Register of Citizens.On January 5 this year, the Supreme Court denied bail to Khalid and Imam in the case related to the alleged conspiracy behind the 2020 riots. In its judgment, the court observed that the two accused stood on a “qualitatively different footing” in terms of the prosecution’s case and the evidence against them.
Share your thoughts in the comments
InsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig Development
Post Comment
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
In September, the Delhi high court had also rejected their bail pleas. The case stems from FIR 59/2020, registered by the Delhi Police Special Cell to investigate the alleged larger conspiracy behind the February 2020 northeast Delhi riots.
