Disgraced Prince Andrew faces a fresh royal scandal over his 2006 Thailand trip after allegations claim he arranged 40 prostitutes and abused taxpayer-funded travel, sparking global outrage, intense scrutiny, and renewed questions about his conduct.
Bangkok is suddenly at the centre of a royal firestorm as King Charles strips his brother of titles over alleged ties to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and jailed socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. Fresh claims spotlight Prince Andrew’s Thailand trips from 2001 to 2011, including one infamous visit where he reportedly seized an entire floor of a luxury Bangkok hotel and allegedly brought in dozens of sex workers. Long dubbed “Randy Andy” by the UK tabloids for his pursuit of young women, the prince is now facing renewed scrutiny and global backlash.
Former Prince Andrew of the United Kingdom in 2006 on an official Thailand visit. (Inset) Prince Andrew greets well-wishers in Bangkok. The Queen’s second son was stripped of his titles Thursday over ties to a global sex scandal. (Source: Mercury News and New York Post)
Disgraced former royal Andrew Mountbatten Windsor faces new explosive allegations from biographer Andrew Lownie. The historian claims Andrew once arranged for 40 prostitutes to be brought to his five-star hotel during a taxpayer-funded trip to Thailand. The alleged events happened over four days during an official visit in June 2006. According to Lownie, the episode occurred while Andrew represented Britain at celebrations for the Thai King in Bangkok.
Moreover, Lownie says Andrew insisted on staying at a luxury hotel instead of the British embassy. He alleges diplomats and officials enabled the arrangement. In addition, Lownie says a senior Thai source confirmed the claims.
The author insists multiple sources backed the story. He describes the alleged behaviour as part of a broader pattern of abuse of public privilege.
Allegations describe Andrew using Thailand trip for sex workers and officials enabling luxury abuse
Andrew was an ambassador for Britain from 2001 to 2011. Over the weekend, sources have claimed that then Prince Charles confided with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair that he opposed the appointment. The then Prince of Wales told Blair Andrew would simply chase women and play golf.
The incident occurred on the UK prince’s visit to celebrate the then Thai King’s 60th anniversary on the throne in 2006. Then Prince Andrew arrived in Bangkok on June 7th 2006. Earlier, in January 2001, he had spent a two-week beach in the country with Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms Maxwell is currently jailed in the United States for her role in the Epstein scandal linked with the abuse of young women.
The former prince developed a very close relationship with Ms Maxwell at that time, whereby she appeared to manage his social life.
During that trip, Andrew stayed in one of Thailand’s most luxurious hotels and oldest hotels in the heart of Bangkok. Reports suggest that he was accommodated in a private suite and took over a whole floor of the hotel for security purposes.
Reports highlight Andrew’s envoy role, ties to Ghislaine Maxwell and luxury stays during Thailand visits
Furthermore, Lownie alleges Andrew exploited official travel to pursue private pleasure. He claims Andrew regularly attached two weeks of personal time to state-funded trips. As a result, British taxpayers unknowingly financed royal leisure and alleged misconduct.
Lownie argues that Andrew saw official duties as opportunities for self-indulgence. He portrays the former prince as a man in a midlife crisis who “chased lots and lots of women.”
However, Lownie also believes the allegations form only a small piece of a larger picture. He says government secrecy has protected Andrew for years. According to him, all official files from Andrew’s decade as trade envoy remain sealed. The period spans 2001 to 2011. Lownie insists those files belong in the National Archives. He argues their closure forms part of a “conspiracy of silence” around Andrew’s conduct.
Additionally, Lownie calls for immediate transparency. He claims Andrew often requested meetings that served private business interests. He says the public deserves to see how Andrew used his government position. Yet, officials continue to block access to the files. Lownie, who has fought through transparency laws before, vows to continue pressing for disclosure.
Claims say Andrew mixed state travel with personal indulgence while files remain sealed from public
The allegations surfaced on the UK Daily Mail’s “Deep Dive: The Fall of the House of York” podcast. They emerged just before Buckingham Palace confirmed decisive action against Andrew. King Charles III stripped Andrew of his last remaining titles. The King also ordered Andrew to vacate Royal Lodge, his Windsor residence of more than 20 years.
Consequently, Andrew now lives under unprecedented royal disgrace. His public role has collapsed. His military titles are gone. His official patronages are gone. His reputation is shattered. Meanwhile, his removal from Royal Lodge marks a symbolic end to his standing inside the family.
In recent months, pressure on Andrew has intensified. Evidence continues to raise questions about his past association with Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew admitted staying friends with Epstein even after the financier’s 2008 conviction. However, he later claimed he cut ties. Reports later suggested communication continued longer than he admitted. Therefore, public trust collapsed.
Additionally, the posthumous memoir of Virginia Roberts Giuffre reignited scrutiny. Giuffre long accused Andrew of forcing her to have sex as a teenager. She said Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her. Yet Andrew has consistently denied the allegations. He settled a civil case with Giuffre in 2022 without admitting wrongdoing. He paid a reported multimillion-pound sum. The palace referred to the settlement as a move to end “distraction.”
Podcast revelations coincide with King stripping Andrew’s titles and pressure over Epstein associations
Even so, critics argue the public still lacks answers. They note Andrew never fully confronted the allegations in court. They highlight his disastrous 2019 BBC interview, where he claimed a medical condition prevented sweating. That interview, meant to clear his name, instead destroyed his credibility. Afterwards, Andrew withdrew from public life.
Since then, the royal household has taken continued steps to distance itself from him. This week’s final stripping of titles and privileges completes that process. Andrew is now a private citizen by all practical measures. His only remaining role involves family events out of public view.
Meanwhile, Lownie’s latest claims raise even more questions about Andrew’s past conduct. They paint a picture of a royal who mixed official duty with extravagant private indulgence. They also suggest that taxpayer money funded inappropriate behaviour. Lownie says the Thailand episode stands out for its scale and brazenness. He claims 40 women visited Andrew’s hotel in four days. He says diplomats facilitated arrangements instead of stopping them.
Critics claim secrecy fuels suspicion while supporters warn against anonymous sources and judgment
Yet the palace has not addressed the new claims. Government departments remain silent. The sealed archives remain sealed. Critics say silence only fuels suspicion. They warn institutions risk appearing complicit. Nevertheless, Andrew’s supporters argue some allegations rely on anonymous sources. They caution against rushed judgment. They insist Andrew faced punishment and should not endure endless attacks. They also argue that unfair speculation now surrounds every aspect of his life.
However, public anger persists. Many citizens question why files remain hidden. Many ask why Andrew enjoyed taxpayer-funded travel with so little oversight. Many also believe justice never fully played out.
Internationally, the scandal continues to damage Britain’s image. Foreign media outlets describe Andrew’s fall as one of the most dramatic royal downfalls in modern history. Commentators call the episode a failure of accountability, transparency, and judgment at the highest levels of public life.
Andrew’s downfall becomes test of UK monarchy’s credibility as public trust demands intensify
Historically, the monarchy has weathered crises. Yet, critics say this scandal marks a new era. Social media amplifies controversy. Public expectations have shifted. Deference has faded. Transparency demands have grown. Andrew’s case symbolises the stakes when public figures abuse privilege.
Going forward, pressure will remain intense. Lownie plans to publish more research. Campaigners will continue seeking official files. Parliament may face calls for inquiries. The Palace may face scrutiny if more allegations emerge.
Crucially, Britain’s constitutional future now very much depends on royal accountability. A modern monarchy must justify public trust. Revelations like these threaten that trust. If institutions hide records, suspicion rises. If officials protect elites, public confidence erodes.
Andrew’s exile appears permanent. His public role vanished. His influence collapsed. His legacy now revolves around scandal, privilege, and secrecy. Meanwhile, his family works to rebuild public faith. King Charles and Prince William promote a streamlined monarchy. They present discipline and service. They distance themselves from Andrew.
Pressure builds for accountability as monarchy modernises and Andrew faces permanent exile
Still, questions linger. What did officials know? Why were taxpayer resources used without scrutiny? Were warnings ignored? Did insiders protect Andrew despite concerns?
Ultimately, Lownie’s allegations intensify a crisis already shaking the British monarchy. They highlight unresolved questions and unanswered accusations. They also spotlight the urgency of transparency in public roles.
King Charles III to be acclaimed as the World comes to terms with the loss of Queen Elizabeth II
US TV late-night star Conan O’Brien to feature Bangkok in HBO travel show in possible tourism boost
For now, the palace remains silent. Andrew denies wrongdoing. Files stay locked. And the public waits for clarity. Yet pressure builds. Critics believe time will reveal the truth. History often does.
In the end, Andrew’s fall represents a monarchy forced to confront its shadows. The once-favoured prince now stands isolated. His life of privilege has collapsed into disgrace. And the world watches, waiting for accountability, honesty, and answers that have long been withheld.
Join the Thai News forum, follow Thai Examiner on Facebook here
Receive all our stories as they come out on Telegram here
Follow Thai Examiner here
Further reading:
King Charles III to be acclaimed as the World comes to terms with the loss of Queen Elizabeth II
Thai PM sends a message to people of the UK on the death of the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Philip
Fury as British Embassy in Ploenchit bulldozed – sold to the Central Group for nearly ฿16 billion in record deal
Sean Connery, the sexiest man alive, who played James Bond, has passed away at 90 years of age in Bahamas
Thailand urged to get on the ball as the full Brexit gets the green light with Christmas Eve trade pact
Johnson triumph watched avidly in Thailand on Friday as vote is good news for the kingdom
Thai King speaks candidly and insightfully on the danger posed by depression to his young audience
Public in Bangkok in stirring show of support for the monarchy on King Bhumibol’s birthday, December 5th
King and Queen visit South to a rapturous salute from well-wishers in Trang and Phatthalung provinces
King tells western TV crews that he loves all Thai people equally and the kingdom is the land of compromise
